Cerny v. Domer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, P. J.
It is undisputed in evidence that the collision upon which this appeal is based took place during the hours of darkness in the eastbound lane of U. S. Route No. 30S east of Marion, Ohio; that as the plaintiff, Cerny, appellant herein, driving east in that lane, topped the crest of a hill he saw the taillights of the eighteen-foot truck of defendant, Domer, appellee herein, clearly visible in his lane of travel in the road ahead of him; that there was no obstruction to his vision and that he continued to see, or could continue to see, such taillights until immediately before the collision;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
- Gumley, Admr. v. CowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Hangen v. HadfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Bickel v. American Can Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
- Carpenter v. McCourt Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cerny v. DomerOhio Supreme Court · 1968