Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peagler Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. USAA Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 2006No. 26128Published

1DissentJustice Waller

I respectfully dissent. I would hold the injury here arose out of the “ownership, maintenance, and use” of the pickup truck.

Under the three-prong test set forth by this Court in State Fam Fire & Cas. Co. v. Aytes, 332 S.C. 30, 503 S.E.2d 744 (1998), the party seeking coverage must first establish a causal connection between the vehicle and the injury. Second, there must exist no act of independent significance breaking the causal link. And third, it must be shown that the vehicle was being used for transportation purposes at the time of the accident. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Aytes, 332…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shinabarger v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kohl v. Union Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API