Legal Opinion
Dystar Corp. v. Canto
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 7, 1997No. Civ.A. 96-11720-PBSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SARIS, District Judge.
Court adopts R & R of M.J. Bowler re: Motion C#63 for Contempt.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT AGAINST DEFENDANTS ROBERT W. MULLEN AND QUALITY TECHNICAL SERVICES CORP. AND QTS, INC. (DOCKET ENTRY # 63)
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs Dystar Corporation (“Dystar”) and Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”) (collectively: “plaintiffs”) request that this court enter an order finding defendant Quality Technical Service Corporation (“Quality Tech”), defendant Robert Mullen (“Mullen”), President of Quality Tech, and nonparty QTS, Inc.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chicago Truck Drivers v. Brotherhood Labor LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- LeMay v. LeanderHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers And Warehouse Workers Union Pension Fund v. Brotherhood Labor LeasingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Productive Marketing, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- State v. Guyton.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.