Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Productive Marketing, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 22, 2001No. CV 00-6502PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
MANELLA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On June 19, 2000, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) initiated this action against defendants Productive Marketing (“Productive”), Foreclosure Solutions dba Formula Solutions (“Foreclosure”), and their principals, Matthew Hyman, Zachary Hyman, and Joshua Hyman (collectively, “Defendants”). The FTC’s Complaint charged Defendants with violating Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), which prohibits “[u]nfair methods of competition ... and unfair or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Possession & Control of the Commissioner of BanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LevineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- In re Possession & Control of the Commissioner of Banks & Real Estate of Independent Trust Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Jamee Deirdre Hundley (AKA James Derrick Hundley) v. AranasDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- ReBath LLC v. HD Solutions LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.