Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Respondent moves to dismiss an appeal taken from what is designated and titled an “interlocutory judgment” rendered against appellant in the above entitled action. The record before us discloses that on June 16, 1941, appellant, acting in his official capacity as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California, filed an application pursuant to the provisions of section 1011 of the Insurance Code for the appointment of a conservator and directing said Insurance Commissioner as such conservator to take possession of respondent Imperial Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation. Upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forgay v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Caminetti v. Imperial Mutual Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Eldridge v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.