Legal Opinion

Doino v. Laehy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, determination confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Judicial review of a penalty imposed by an administrative agency is limited to determining whether the punishment is “ ‘ “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness”.’ [citations omitted]” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233). In view of the serious nature of petitioner’s misconduct, the penalty of dismissal cannot be said to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rores v. PassidomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Ross v. BringewattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Schembeck v. Village Board of Village of DolgevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Osborne v. NellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API