Legal Opinion
Wilcher v. City of Wilmington
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 30, 1996No. Civil Action 94-137-JJFPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reargument and New Trial. (D.I. 146.) ' Defendant City of Wilmington (“City”) and Third-Party Defendant SO-DAT-Delaware, Ine. (“Sodat”), have both responded that the Plaintiffs are not entitled to a new trial. (D.I. 146, 147.) Because no factual issues were in dispute at the trial, and because the Court believes it correctly decided the issues before it as questions of law, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs are not entitled to a new trial or reargument.
I. BACKGROUND
This is a class action filed on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilcher v. City Of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Pirelli Cable Corp. v. Ciena Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Wilcher v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Wilcher v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998