Wilcher v. City of Wilmington
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FAENAN, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by the City of Wilmington, James A. Sills, James T. Wilmore, Sr., Clifton E. Arm-stead, S.A. Wayne Crosse, and William J. Yanonis (collectively “the Defendants”) (D.I.166) and one filed by SODAT-Dela-ware, Inc.(“SODAT”), a third-party defendant (D.I.167). By their motions, the Defendants and SODAT seek summary judgment on the Plaintiffs’ claim that the urine collection procedure for drug testing utilized by the Defendants and performed by SODAT constitutes an invasion of privacy under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Louis W. Epstein Family Partnership Levitz Furniture Corporation, Intervenor in D.C. v. Kmart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Sarah Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Vogel v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCary v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Senchery v. Middletown Police Dept.Superior Court of Delaware · 2020
- Valentin v. WysockDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022