Wilcher v. City of Wilmington
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the City of Wilmington’s method of testing firefighters for drug use violates their rights under the Fourth Amendment. We will affirm the district court’s conclusion that it does not. Nevertheless, we will remand the ease for reconsideration of the state law invasion of privacy claim.
Beverly Wilcher, Sharon Smith, Michael Danylo and Cornelius Skinner are Wilmington firefighters. Along with the Wilmington Fire Fighters Association (WFFA), they brought this class action on behalf of all firefighters in the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilcher v. City Of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- (PS) Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020