Legal Opinion
Lane Transit District v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 29, 1997No. 1695-02904; CA A89559PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*111LANDAU, J.
Citizens for Responsible Public Transit (Citizens) filed a proposed initiative measure that, if enacted, would alter the salary of the general manager of the Lane Transit District (LTD) and revise the procedures by which that salary is increased. LTD brought this action requesting a declaration that the measure was administrative in nature, and therefore not subject to the initiative power, and seeking an injunction preventing Lane County (County) and its Chief Deputy Clerk from putting the measure on the local ballot. Citizens intervened and moved for summary judgment. LTD also…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lane Transit District v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Dority v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Lane Transit District v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Marriage of VoglColorado Court of Appeals · 2021