Legal Opinion

Lane Transit District v. Lane County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1997No. 1695-02904; CA A89559Published

1Opinion of the Court

932 P.2d 81 (1997)

146 Or. App. 109

LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT, a municipal corporation, Respondent,

v.

LANE COUNTY, Oregon, a municipal corporation, and Annette Newingham, Chief Deputy County Clerk of Lane County, Oregon, Defendants, and

Citizens for Responsible Public Transit, a registered political action committee, Appellant.

1695-02904; CA A89559.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted January 8, 1996.

Decided January 29, 1997.

Susan L. Stoner, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Joel S. DeVore, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Rose v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Long v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API