Legal Opinion

M. Samuels & Co. v. Zorbas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1931No. 28,217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover rent on a lease. There were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appealed from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

On May 26, 1926, the plaintiff was the owner of property in Duluth. One Larkin represented it in negotiations with the defendant Zorbas, who was in possession, for a lease over a period of years commencing in 1927. A lease dated May 26, 1926, -acknowledged by Zorbas on the same day, was made and sent to the plaintiff at Baltimore for execution. Larkin had no authority to bind the plaintiff to the terms of a lease and Zorbas knew it. The lease…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shake v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Johnson v. M. J. O'neil, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. TaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Heckman v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API