Legal Opinion

Shake v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1924No. 23,656PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, 0.

This is an action on two policies of fire insurance issued to plaintiffs by defendant, the first in July and the second in September, 1921. The action was defended on the ground that a portion of plaintiffs’ claim was for the loss of clothing left with them by their customers to be renovated. The policies were written by W. L. Alexander, defendant’s local agent at Pipestone, were in the standard form, and, as first written, had riders attached with a clause in one reading as follows: “Item 4 — $500 on Ladies’ and gentlemen’s suits, new and those that have been left for repairs, etc,”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Banner Laundry Co. v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Haley v. Sharon Township Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Kollitz v. Equitable Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. ACUITY v. Bryan C. Johnson, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. National Insurance UnderwritersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. American Lumber & Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API