Legal Opinion

Scottsdale Insurance v. Tolliver

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 2009No. 04-CV-0227-CVE-FHMPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CLAIRE V. EAGAN, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court are the reports and recommendations (Dkt. ## 227, 236) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiffs Supplemental Combined Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Brief in Support (Dkt. # 185). Defendants have filed an objection (Dkt. # 237) to the reports and recommendations as to plaintiffs right to recover fees, but the parties have filed a stipulation (Dkt. # 235) concerning the amount of fees.1

I

Sandra and Michael Tolliver purchased a home located at 1735 East 31st Street, Tulsa, OMahoma, and applied for dwelling insurance with…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. 2121 East 30th StreetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carolina Madera v. Comenity Capital Bank; Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API