Legal Opinion
United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 17, 1996No. 94-5192PublishedCited by 2,631 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.
This case, which arises out of a civil forfeiture action, requires us to consider whether a general objection to a magistrate’s report and recommendation will suffice to preserve a party’s challenges to that report for appeal. We conclude that it will not.1
Appellant Gary Hobbs, who is an attorney, allegedly used proceeds from his criminal activities to purchase a home and a car, which were the subject of a civil forfeiture action. The house was titled in the name of Gary and his wife, Mary Kay Hobbs, and the ear was titled in the names of Gary’s parents,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,631 opinions
- United States v. Nicholas Omar MidgetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Sealock v. State Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- Vega v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Port City Properties v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2,626 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.