Legal Opinion

Tiede v. Robuck Homes, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 20, 1996No. I.C. No. 054523Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before former Deputy Commissioner Tamara R. Nance. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS

1. The defendant-employer regularly employed three or more employees.

2. The employer-employee relationship existed between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Craver v. Dixie Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Barham v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API