Legal Opinion

Lederman v. Lazarus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1923No. Appeal, No. 18PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This was an issue in sheriff’s interpleader proceedings growing out of an attachment issued against J. Lederman under the Fraudulent Debtor’s Acts. The goods attached were claimed by the plaintiff, C. A. Lederman, the brother of J. Lederman, and the issue was framed to try his title to them. While the case was pending in the court below, J. Lederman, the defendant in the attachment, was declared a bankrupt and his trustee, the present appellee, was subrogated to the rights of the attaching creditor and became the defendant of record. The claimant and plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stegmaier v. Keystone Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Clark v. MillettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Carter v. Henderson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Brown v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Cromelien v. MaugerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1852

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kehres v. StuempfleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Pierson v. LondonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Harris v. BlitzsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Gertrude Normile v. MartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Schelly v. GribbinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API