Legal Opinion
Com. v. MacKill (Et Al.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Argued November 18, 1935. The defendant, James Mackill, holder of a Retailer's Malt Liquor License, executed a bond, with the Seaboard Surety Company as Surety, in favor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the penal sum of $1,000. This bond was given pursuant to the requirements of the Malt Liquor License Law of 1933. On or about March 23, 1934, Mackill, having been indicted for violations of the Malt Liquor License Law of 1933, was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of three hundred ($300) dollars and costs, or to serve six months in jail in default thereof. Four days later Mackill…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Commonwealth v. J. & A. Moeschlin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Commonwealth v. Eclipse Literary & Social ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lightner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. McMenamin (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936