Legal Opinion
Knox v. Streatfield
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1978No. Civ. 51539PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J.
Plaintiff Knox appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his third amended complaint without leave to amend. The action was brought against defendants Streatfield, et al., for damages for and injunctive relief for alleged violations of a declaration of restrictions of the Malibu Bay Club. The action purports to be a class action.
Facts
Plaintiff Harvey Knox filed a complaint on November 14, 1975, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated. The class of persons he sought to represent are those owners of property located within the Malibu Bay Club who had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Residents of Beverly Glen, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Occidental Land, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bartlett v. Hawaiian Village, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- In Re Marriage of Van HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983