Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Jacobs

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 9, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01745Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 BYRON CHAPMAN, No. 2:17-cv-1745 WBS CKD 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM & ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 MARK C. JACOBS, ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND LITIGATION EXPENSES 16 Defendant. 17 18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Before the court is plaintiff’s Motion for Reasonable 20 Attorneys’ Fees, Including Costs and Litigation Expenses. 21 (Docket No. 29.) Plaintiff Byron Chapman is a physically 22 handicapped person who brought this action based on barriers he 23 encountered at defendant Mark Jacob’s law…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API