Legal Opinion
Marro v. Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 17, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 11, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendants Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner and Steve Marchelos, and the separate motions of the defendants Michael Handwerker and Charles J. Gayner, to dismiss the cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice insofar as asserted against them on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Piliero v. Adler & StavrosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Wester v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Elliott v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Farage v. EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kanter v. PieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Sommers v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Loria v. CernigliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fleyshman v. Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.