Legal Opinion

Argueta v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 3, 2001No. 831, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIEME, Judge.

The Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted appellant Jose E. Argueta for carrying a concealed dangerous or deadly weapon. The court subsequently imposed an eleven-month sentence, which was suspended in favor of eleven months of supervised probation. Appellant appeals his conviction and raises the following issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court erred in failing to suppress the Defendant’s statement.

2. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support a conviction of the Defendant for violating Article 27, § 36.

We answer “yes” to question 1 and therefore reverse…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Bond v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Lan Buck v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Craig v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API