Legal Opinion

Bond v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 8, 2002No. 653, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBORAH S. EYLER, Judge.

In this case we must decide whether Richard Bond, the appellant, was in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona, 884 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), when three police officers entered his bedroom late at night and questioned him about a crime that had taken place a few hours before, and that witnesses said he had committed. In re-. sponding to the officers, the appellant made incriminating statements that ultimately were admitted into evidence by the State at his jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County, on charges of driving on a revoked…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. MathenySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Snowden v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API