Legal Opinion

Tweedie Trading Co. v. Pitch Pine Lumber Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1907PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Admiralty. On exceptions by both parties to commissioner’s report on reference pursuant to decision reported in 146 Fed. 612.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

Of some of the arguments at bar, it is enough to say that the interlocutory decree entitles libelant to some demurrage, assessable against respondent as for a breach by it of the contract of carriage and of section 9 of the bill of lading (both set forth at length in the decision on the merits).

The exceptions filed, and the language of the instruments referred to, require consideration of two legal queries: (1) When does the laying time begin of a ship entitled “to commence discharging immediately upon arrival”? And (2) how is the laying time to be computed if the ship…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. KeyserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State of RussiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  4. Yone Suzuki & Co. v. Central Argentine Ry. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  5. Schwaner v. KerrDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API