Legal Opinion

Yone Suzuki & Co. v. Central Argentine Ry. Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 4, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONDY, District Judge.

Four libels: against the Central Argentine Railway, Limited, for demurrage and expenses incurred in discharging coal at Buenos Aires, were consolidated and tried together.

The Central Argentine Railway Company bought coal e. i. f. from Gano Moore Company. Thereafter Gano Moore Company entered into a charter party with each, libelant for the transportation of the eoal from Hampton Roads to Buenos Aires. Each charter party contained a cesser clause, providing that the liability of the charterer should terminate as soon as the cargo is loaded and the freight paid, and that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. W. K. Niver Coal Co. v. Cheronea S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eagle, Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  2. Swift & Co. v. Compania Transmaritima Colombiana, S. A.District Court, Canal Zone · 1948
  3. United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  4. Guadalupe v. Hernandez Pineda v. David LesterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
  5. Maisler v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API