Legal Opinion
Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 20, 1928No. 253PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The libelants, are met at the threshold by the contention of the railway that the cesser clause of the charter parties, which were incorporated in the bills of lading, relieved it from liability. They say the Argentine law governs the liability, and that that law is evidenced by the decision of an Argentine Court of Appeal in the ease of The Moncalieri, which was a, vessel chartered by Gano Moore under circumstances similar to those here. In that ease the Argentine Railway was sued for demurrage by the owner of the Moncalieri, and the court held that the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Fonseca v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Trans-Asiatic Oil Ltd., S.A. v. Apex Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. KulukundisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.