Legal Opinion

Miller v. Fosdick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1901No. 3,370PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant was the plaintiff, and the appellees, Elizabeth H. Eosdick and William M. Carr, were defendants, and the appellee Eosdick recovered judgment for costs against the appellant. No judgment was rendered either for or against the appellee Carr, who was defaulted. It was a suit to foreclose a material-man’s lien, and the correctness of the court’s conclusions of law upon the facts stated in a special finding is questioned.

It will not suffice for the enforcement of a material-man’s lien to make it appear that the materials were furnished to a contractor or to the owner and were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Smith v. NewbaurIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of Crawfordsville v. BrundageIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hill v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Puritan Engineering Corp. v. Robinson, Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Foster Lumber Co. v. Sigma Chi Chapter House of DePauw UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Van Wells v. Stanray CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. McClure v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Topp v. Standard Metal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API