Davis v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
This matter is here before me on a motion for summary judgment presented by the defendant, the United States of America, under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit for the recovery of Federal income taxes and interest in the amount of $11,005.77, with statutory interest, which had been assessed and collected from the plaintiffs in the taxable year 1961. The plaintiffs do not dispute the accuracy of the facts which relate the chronology of events in the instant case, but do question “some of the factual…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Boyle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Elizabeth N. B. Ferro v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1970