Legal Opinion
Sweeting v. Hammons
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 23, 1988No. 86-1857PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENDRY, Judge.
Claimant Sweeting appeals from a circuit court order entered in apportionment proceedings which awarded appellee Ham-mons $9,759 as compensation for “immovable fixtures” installed by Hammons for the purpose of operating a bar in Sweet-ing’s building. The property was taken in eminent domain proceedings by Dade County on October 1, 1984.
When Dade County filed its petition in condemnation in June 1984, one of the properties designated was parcel UM-04-05 owned by appellant but under a lease agreement with Hammons, d/b/a Mo’s Bar. The agreement provided by Sweeting was a printed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Commercial Finance Co. v. Brooksville Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Matz v. Miami Club Restaurant (Mo. 1939)Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryan & Jessica Dominguez v. Hayward IndustriesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Orlando/Orange County Expressway Authority v. Tuscan Ridge, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- H. Allen Holmes, Inc. v. Jim Molter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Hernando County v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.