Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Russell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 12, 1990No. 89-0286PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POLEN, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. See Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. Russell, 521 So.2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), hereinafter Russell I.

In Russell I, this court reversed a determination by the trial court that appellee had continuous uninsured motorist coverage. In essence, this court found that ap-pellee was entitled to uninsured motorist benefits but not as contained in the amended final judgment. We ordered that the trial court’s original final judgment be reinstated and denied an award of appellate attorney’s fees to appellee.

*940Prior to the Russell I…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Aristek Communities, Inc. v. FullerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Cooper v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Sweeting v. HammonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell v. Frank H. Furman, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API