Williby v. State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Harry J. Williby appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting partial summary judgment in favor of defendants and dismissing his action alleging that defendants violated his civil rights when, after his conviction, prison officials obtained DNA samples. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, Plumeau v. Sch. Dist. No. 40, 130 F.3d 432, 435 (9th Cir.1997), and a dismissal for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, Rodriguez v. Panayiotou, 314 F.3d 979, 983 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.
The district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jones v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Rafael Chodos, an Individual v. West Publishing Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation Doing Business in California Dba Bancroft-Whitney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- (PC) Dennis v. CastrilloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Flowers v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Paschall v. JohalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Perez v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC)Coleman v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.