Legal Opinion
(PC)Coleman v. Moore
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 22, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00324Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS DOE DEFENDANTS 13 v. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE 14 MOORE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff filed his complaint on March 3, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Following screening, in relevant 21 part, the Court found Plaintiff states cognizable Eighth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Andrew John Walker, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. George W. Sumner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Prestige Entm't W., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Williby v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008