Legal Opinion

Doe v. LIFE INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA (LINA)

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 25, 2010No. C 09-01665 LBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 51]

LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this ERISA action, Plaintiff John Doe, 1 a former employee of Excite, Inc., moved for summary judgment that he is covered under Excite’s life insurance policy (administered by LINA), and that he does not have to pay insurance premiums because he is disabled under the plan. Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment Motion, ECF No. 51 at 11-15. 2 Defendants counter as follows: (A) the policy provides for waiver of the premiums and continued coverage for disabled employees only if…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lat v. Farmers New World Life Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Lat v. Farmers New World Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Lat v. Farmers New World Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Lat v. Farmers New World Life Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API