Legal Opinion

DeCespedes v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Company of Chicago, Illinois

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 20, 1967No. 36203PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

202 So.2d 561 (1967)

Praxedes DeCESPEDES and Gladys DeCespedes, and Frieda Castillo, Petitioners,

v.

PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, Respondents.

No. 36203.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 20, 1967.

Richard H. Reynolds and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for petitioners.

Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for respondents.

2Per curiam

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in this cause has been certified to this court as one passing upon a question of great public interest. The decision certified to us is reported at 193 So.2d 224.

After hearing oral argument of the parties and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeCespedes v. Prudence Mut. Cas. Co. of Chicago, Ill.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. BirchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Birch v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. of ShelbySupreme Court of Florida · 1967

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. RaderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ReitlerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Smith v. Travelers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Rodriguez v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API