Legal Opinion
Judge v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 30, 1991No. 90-392PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant was convicted of distribution of cocaine, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1989). He was sentenced to twenty months to five years imprisonment. Appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error in telling the prosecutor to turn over Jencks Act 1 material in the presence of the jury and commenting on the material. Appellant further alleges that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he possessed a usable amount of cocaine and that the aiding and abetting instruction was improper. We find no mer it to the errors alleged and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Head v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- George E. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Barnes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.