Legal Opinion

Brown v. Eckel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 80, Calendar No. 36,175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff began ejectment against defendants to recover a parcel .of land on Mackinac Island formerly owned by George T. Arnold. George T. Arnold died. His real estate was devised to his widow, Susan B. Arnold, who conveyed the premises in question to plaintiff. This is the basis of her claimed title and right to recover. Defendants claim George T. Arnold bought the premises in question for Alexander Duffina, father of plaintiff and defendant Lena Eckel; that George T. Arnold sold the premises to Alexander Duffina; payments on the land contract were made; the contract price paid; the contract…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Webber v. Pere Marquette Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cronin v. GoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Covert v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Drake v. HappMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New Products Corporation v. Harbor Shores Bhbt Land DevelopmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Ridgley v. RomaMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Benton Harbor Federation of Women's Clubs v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Closser v. AbrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API