Legal Opinion

Drake v. Happ

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Ejectment. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is ejectment for a portion of a water lot on the southerly shore and near the mouth of the St. Joseph river. The premises are described- in the declaration as—

“Commencing on the St. Joseph river, southerly bank, at a point 2 feet above the railroad bridge of the Chicago & West Michigan Railway Company, which bridge crosses said river, and running thence easterly along the edge of the wharf or dock up the river 66 feet; thence southerly to a point on the northerly line of the road, which runs westerly under said railroad bridge, 68 feet easterly from' said bridge; thence westerly, along…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Johnstone v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Steinhauser v. KuhnMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Killackey v. KillackeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Lamberton v. PawloskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Brown v. EckelMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dawson v. Falls City Boat ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API