Legal Opinion

Ridgley v. Roma

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1937No. Docket No. 138, Calendar No. 39,468PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action in ejectment involving 40 acres of land in Ogemaw county, considered worthless until the recent discovery of oil. Plaintiffs claim title in fee and defendants under a claimed perfected tax title. Plaintiffs attack the validity of the tax title and defendants reply in kind. By bringing this form of action plaintiffs invoke strict rules of law in considering the titles.

Plaintiffs’ recovery, if any, rests upon the strength of their own title and not on the weakness of defendants’. West Michigan Park Ass’n v. Railroad Co., 172 Mich. 179; Kushler v. Weber, 182 Mich. 224; Bird v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. West Michigan Park Ass'n v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bird v. StimsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Saginaw County Savings Bank v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Brown v. EckelMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Kushler v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barker v. KlinglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Township of Pontiac v. FeatherstoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Briggs v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Smelsey v. Safety Investment Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Hurd v. HinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API