Legal Opinion

Rozek v. Christen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 16, 1963No. 20,318Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

We refer to plaintiff in error as Rozek, to all defendants in error as such, to Christen, Farrell and Lunine individually by name, or together as “the expected adverse parties,” and to Tippo, Brown, Newton, Nossaman, Rense and Waldrop individually by name, or together as “the witnesses.”

On May 9, 1962, Rozek filed his verified petition in the District Court of Boulder County, whereby he sought to be allowed to examine the defendants in error under oath and to perpetuate their testimony.

Rozek seeks to invoke the aid afforded by R.C.P. Colo., Rule 27(a) (1), pertinent portions of which provide:

“…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Pitcher v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Irving v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. In Re Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  5. Clark's Admr. v. Wilmington Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API