Legal Opinion

Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 24, 1995PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

stein' J.

As in Rendine v. Pantzer, 141 N.J. 292, 661 A.2d 1202 (1995), also decided today, this appeal concerns the standards to be applied by trial courts in awarding a reasonable counsel fee under state fee-shifting statutes. Specifically, we consider the extent to which a plaintiffs contingent fee agreement with her attorney limits or affects the award of a reasonable attorney’s fee. Collaterally, we address whether a reasonable attorney’s fee awarded under a state fee-shifting statute must necessarily be proportion ate to the damages recovered in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. CollierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Tarr v. CiasulliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  3. Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  5. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API