Legal Opinion

Mau v. Omaha National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1980No. 43024PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrodkey, J.

This is an action by Robert L. Mau, plaintiff-appellant, seeking damages for his allegedly wrongful discharge from employment by the defendant-appellee, the Omaha National Bank. The plaintiffs claim for damages was dismissed by the District Court for Douglas County, Nebraska. We affirm.

The facts relevant to this appeal indicate that Mau had been employed by the defendant for 28 years prior to his termination on December 3, 1976. There was no written contract of employment entered with the bank, but the basic terms of his employment in 1948 were a starting salary of $100 per month, a work week…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Cook v. Heck's Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Leikvold v. Valley View Community HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Panto v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API