Rodriguez v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
EUBANK; Presiding Judge.
The substantial questions raised by this review by certiorari of the Industrial Commission’s award is whether the evidence supports the Commission’s findings that the petitioner violated a company work rule, failed to prove that his injury arose out of and in the course of his employment, and failed to carry his burden of proof generally. Our review requires that we affirm the Commission’s award.
On December 20, 1970, the petitioner was employed as a lead operator at one of the employer’s ore crushing plants located at San Manuel, Arizona. At this point in time and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Harrington v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Gaumer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Anderson Clayton & Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- City Products Corporation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Bechtel Power Corp. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Bergmann Precision, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.