Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 24, 1889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Sac District Qourt. — Hon. J. P. Conner, Judge. Action to recover for hay burned by fires set out by engines operated upon defendant’s railroad. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. Evidence : made°orÑ leased land. I. Counsel for defendant insist that the plaintiffs failed upon the trial to show that they owned

hay for the burning of which the action is brought, and that an instruction to the jury asked by defendant, directing a verdict on that ground, ought to have been given. We think the instruction was rightly refused. The testimony tends to show that plaintiffs had leased the land from one who they understood was the owner, and had cut and stacked the hay thereon. The land was unbroken prairie, but was wholly or partly fenced. The persons of whom the plaintiffs-…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brentner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fell v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bridenstine v. Iowa City Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Hagan v. Chicago, Detroit & Canada Grand Trunk Junction RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API