Legal Opinion

Kraker v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1911No. Civ. No. 939. First Appellate DistrictPublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of review to annul a judgment and order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Petitioner filed his petition in this court for a writ of review, for the purpose of reviewing the action of the superior court in dismissing an appeal taken by said Kraker from a judgment rendered in the justice’s court against said Kraker and in favor of one Albert Mueller, who was the plaintiff in the action in said justice’s court. No formal answer was made to the writ, but both parties appeared and obtained leave to file briefs. In the briefs the matter has been presented as upon a demurrer to the petition.

From the facts thus admitted it appears that an action was commenced in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Buckley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Smith v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Carlson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Chaney v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Chaney v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Hoelzel v. Kelly and DuffyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Yee v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API