Legal Opinion

Harwood v. McMurtry

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 9, 1938No. 1930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

This case is submitted upon the plaintiff’s demurrer to an amended answer filed on July 16, 1937. The question raised by the demurrer to which the parties, in their briefs, especially direct the court’s attention, is whether the law affords a public officer absolute protection and immunity from liability on account of a false statement maliciously made in a communication to his superior when such statement is made in the course and discharge of official duties and is pertinent and relevant thereto.

In the case of Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 16 S.Ct. 631, 40 L.Ed. 780,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Ex Parte SackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Mellon v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Catron v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Lanier v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1981
  4. Block v. SassamanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  5. Kenneth T. Lyons v. W. E. Howard, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API