Legal Opinion

Oaks v. McQuiller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 10, 1998No. 2 CA-CV 97-0001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiff/appellant Elmer Oaks appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendanf/appellee Randal J. McQuiller in Oaks’s personal injury action. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate and remand.

Facts and Procedural Background

¶ 2 The facts in this case are not in dispute. Oaks and McQuiller were involved in an automobile accident in which Oaks was injured. At the time of the collision, Oaks was acting in the course and scope of his employment but did not apply for workers’ compensation benefits, although he had not opted out of the workers’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Aitken v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yollin v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Koss Corp. v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Downing v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Jackson v. Eagle KMC LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API