Legal Opinion

Downing v. Downing

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 25, 2011No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0088PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 La Vancha Downing appeals from the trial court’s ruling reducing her former husband’s, Rick Downing, spousal maintenance obligation to one hundred dollars per month. She contends the court erred in interpreting AR.S. § 25-530 and suggests we may reconcile § 25-530 with the spousal maintenance factors in AR.S. § 25 — 319(B)(4) and (5) to reach a different result. She also argues the court erred in denying her request for attorney fees. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. In Re Marriage of DougallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Swain v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API