Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Reed

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1839PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Motion to set aside report of referees. The declaration contained the common money counts. The suit was commenced by declaration, which wás served on the defendant, Reed, only. The plaintiffs are commission merchants in the city of New York. The defendant, Dixson, in the fall of 1835 and the year following, resided at Richmond, Ontario county, and was largely engaged in manufacturing flour, which was sent to, and sold by the-plaintiffs, in New- York.

Read the full summary

Motion to set aside report of referees. The declaration contained the common money counts. The suit was commenced by declaration, which wás served on the defendant, Reed, only. The plaintiffs are commission merchants in the city of New York. The defendant, Dixson, in the fall of 1835 and the year following, resided at Richmond, Ontario county, and was largely engaged in manufacturing flour, which was sent to, and sold by the-plaintiffs, in New- York. From time to time Dixson drew bills on the plaintiffs to a large amount, which the plaintiffs, as they alleged, paid and took up, without having…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

If we assume that.the plaintiffs are right on all the controverted questions of fact in the case, they must still fail in their action. If they were in truth accommodation acceptors and Had no funds applicable to the payment of these bills, their remedy is against Dixson, the principal, for whose accommodation they accepted; and not against Reed the surety.

As an original question, it would, perhaps, be well that a man should never be allowed to become a party to commercial paper as a surety—or rather, that his character of surety. should be wholly disregarded. But it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Beardsley v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Manchester Iron Manufacturing Co. v. SweetingNew York Supreme Court · 1833

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Barry v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Rouse v. . WhitedNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  4. Easterly v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Port v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API