Legal Opinion

Sauder Woodworking Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1988No. 86-1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The exemption provided by R.C. 5739.02(B)(15) was suspended for six months of the audit period by Section 9 of Am. S.B. No. 448 (138 Ohio Laws, Part I, 1327, 1334):

“Beginning on January 1, 1981, and continuing through June 30,1981, the exemption from the sales tax for packages and packaging machinery, equipment, and material granted pursuant to section 5739.02(B)(15) of the Revised Code, and made applicable to the use tax by section 5741.02(C)(2), shall be of no force or effect and such packaging machinery, equipment, and material that is not taxed because of the operation of those sections…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Jennings & Churella Construction Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Custom Beverage Packers, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. General Mills, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Accel, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. WALKER'S, INC. v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  5. Beare Co. v. Tennessee Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API