Legal Opinion
Mount Washington Tanker Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 25, 1981No. Appeal No. 81-10PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Baldwin, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the United States Court of International Trade 1 in which the phrase “repairs made in a foreign country” appearing in 19 U.S.C. 1466(a) 2 was construed, apparently for the first time. On the facts presented, the Court of International Trade concluded, inter alia, that the routine ship repairs on board appellant’s oil tanker while it was on the high seas by employees of a Swedish corporation hired for the task were “made in a foreign country” within the meaning of § 1466(a) and that the costs of such repairs were subject to the 50% duty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burnet v. Chicago Portrait Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
- Erie Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- United States v. GisselDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texaco Marine Services, Inc. And Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Capital Marine Supply, Inc. v. M/v Roland Thomas, Ii, Etc., Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. M/v Roland Thomas, Ii, Etc., Leonard Prejean, in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Beloit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Frontier Ditch Co. v. Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.